Key Features:
* Robust, Light-Weight Communications for at Sea Operations
* Certus 700 Services (352 kbps Up/704 kbps Down & 256 kbps Streaming Capable)
*100% Global Satellite Coverage and Low Latency for Critical Data and Voice Communications
1. https://blogs.nasa.gov/earthexpeditions/wp-content/uploads/s...
2. https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/markets/market-specific-solut...
3. https://www.thalesgroup.com/sites/default/files/database/doc...
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_satellite_constellatio...
5. https://seatech.systems/product/thales-vesselink-700-for-iri...
With that amount of money I'm sure the system would be able to grow to accommodate (including sending up more satellites) if only to make sure the money doesn't go to another competitor.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iridium_satellite_constellatio...
2. https://www.satphonestore.com/tech-browsing/satellite-intern...
The Thales VesseLink modem they used consumes 65W nominal/120W maximum. It offers a connection speed of a couple hundred kbps, so sending up a video file of a fixed size will require it to be on for quite a while - Assuming 200 kbps average, and a 360 MB video, that's 4 hours of uploading or 260 Watt-hours. Also, it's 12x9x2", and weighs 7.5 lbs; this is a boat not a hobby quadcopter. 260 Watt-hours is a lot; that's like 3 laptop batteries, but that's still smaller than the modem itself.
Starlink does consume 100W, but offers a connection speed of about 200 Mbps. The 360 MB video upload could complete in 14.4 seconds, which consumes 100 W * 14.4 seconds / 3600 seconds/hour = 0.4 Watt-hours. It is significantly larger, and it would probably have a harder time handling rough seas (not to mention saltwater intrusion), but that's a lot less power.
Whichever modem you're using, you'd want to turn it on infrequently.
Edit: The Saildrone product brief is here:
https://assets.website-files.com/5beaf972d32c0c1ce1fa1863/61...
It describes a 23' or 7m boat. The 33'/10m larger version has 300W continuous sensor power/2kW peak available from the solar panels, which appear to be of a comparable size to those on the Saildrone.
It is still very costly on a dollars per MB of data transferred basis.
The main problem with it is the very high dollars per megabyte cost. If you're a billionaire or a nation state with a $30 million Gulfstream jet and an Iridium terminal on it you probably don't care. But it can be cost prohibitive for any appreciable amount of data transfer from remote scientific systems.
It will be a life-changing event for maritime robotics, assuming they don't get too greedy.