zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. throaw+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-09-25 10:36:10
The stridency with which people attempt to shut down discussion of a lab origin points in the direction of a coverup.

An example of this happening is on Wikipedia where one editor in particular seems to have declared it to be a “conspiracy theory” and scrubs every mention of it. The editor in question scrubs talk pages and their own talk page, thus effectively preventing any kind of consensus forming, which is out of the ordinary for Wikipedia. They have remarkable stamina, and thus can our out-wait other editors.

Wikipedia seems to be one example of a much bigger effort to suppress discussion of a potential lab leak.

replies(2): >>bondar+pf >>TechBr+2a1
2. bondar+pf[view] [source] 2021-09-25 13:23:21
>>throaw+(OP)
Link to the editor?
3. TechBr+2a1[view] [source] 2021-09-25 21:47:38
>>throaw+(OP)
Wikipedia Talk pages are an underrated venue for restrained flame wars. If you’re looking for your two minutes of hate today, just go to any Talk page for a controversial subject that’s been “debunked” in the last year or so.
[go to top]