zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Picass+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-09-25 10:32:54
He proudly proclaims his research in this video, he is not hiding anything: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdYDL_RK--w
replies(1): >>lps41+55
2. lps41+55[view] [source] 2021-09-25 11:40:56
>>Picass+(OP)
He absolutely did try to hide things. He tried to hide his relationship to the original Lancet article denouncing the lab leak theory, because he knew it was a staggering conflict of interest:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/the-lab-leak-theory-...

replies(1): >>kennyw+F6
◧◩
3. kennyw+F6[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 11:58:31
>>lps41+55
Person organizing PR statement takes actions to make that PR statement as effective as possible? Not exactly a cover up. I don’t “like” my own instagram posts for the same reason.
replies(2): >>lps41+N7 >>dash2+Y7
◧◩◪
4. lps41+N7[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 12:09:21
>>kennyw+F6
It’s expected that conflicts of interest be disclosed in journalism and things like this. Instead he actively worked to hide his conflict of interest.
replies(1): >>noptd+I31
◧◩◪
5. dash2+Y7[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 12:10:39
>>kennyw+F6
Scientists have to hold themselves to a higher ethical standard than PR flacks.
◧◩◪◨
6. noptd+I31[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 20:48:52
>>lps41+N7
Exactly, and it looks like almost all of them did:

>All but one scientist who penned a letter in The Lancet dismissing the possibility that coronavirus could have come from a lab in Wuhan were linked to its Chinese researchers, their colleagues or funders, a Telegraph investigation can reveal.

Source: https://archive.ph/dXc0n

[go to top]