zlacker

[parent] [thread] 8 comments
1. brendo+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-09-25 00:41:46
I've never heard of peakprosperity.com, but it seems to be a site geared towards preppers/libertarians/those who are already predisposed to a lack of institutional trust. You can claim he's data driven and level headed, but the context that he's operating in--and the audience that he's speaking to--tells me that he's probably not being unbiased in his analysis.
replies(2): >>thedud+f1 >>sjwalt+N1
2. thedud+f1[view] [source] 2021-09-25 00:57:11
>>brendo+(OP)
please send me some good sites which produce unbiased analysis, thanks.
replies(1): >>brendo+A1
◧◩
3. brendo+A1[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:02:28
>>thedud+f1
That's not my job, sorry.
replies(2): >>abnry+74 >>teh_kl+i5
4. sjwalt+N1[view] [source] 2021-09-25 01:06:02
>>brendo+(OP)
Eh, regardless of what you think of the source, it's backed by hard, verifiable evidence.

Peak Prosperity was not about prepping much at all until Covid, as far as I know. Dr. Martenson started pushing home gardening and stocking up when covid hit--in fact, he started saying such things in like February 2020--pretty prescient.

◧◩◪
5. abnry+74[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:28:31
>>brendo+A1
It's easy to be a critic.
replies(1): >>dylan6+17
◧◩◪
6. teh_kl+i5[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:42:17
>>brendo+A1
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You can't hide behind the "go and look it up" response as is often uttered by science deniers.
replies(1): >>brendo+w5
◧◩◪◨
7. brendo+w5[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 01:43:53
>>teh_kl+i5
The extraordinary claim is that the virus was man-made.

Edit to say: I don't think saying the virus came from nature requires any additional proof. The claim that requires extraordinary, indisputable proof is the claim that it was man-made. And I have yet to see it, from this or any source. Just a big compilation of weak, circumstantial evidence.

replies(1): >>willup+og
◧◩◪◨
8. dylan6+17[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 02:00:32
>>abnry+74
Sometimes, an issue needs to be called out even if you don't have the solution.
◧◩◪◨⬒
9. willup+og[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-09-25 03:53:55
>>brendo+w5
It's no longer an extraordinary circumstantial claim. It might never have been because this kind of research that very well could cause a COVID pandemic was being concealed by the very people that decided very early that there was no question the origin was natural. They were performing risky and highly similar research and they made huge contradictory statements that conflict with this leaked evidence, and they are very well connected to each other. You are going to need extraordinary reasons why these people don't deserve an investigation into what they had been doing and what they did know that wasn't being shared.
[go to top]