zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. hnfong+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-06-26 18:27:58
> OP's comment seemed to take primary issue with the mind-changing. I think the OP was more accurate than you (or even they) thought.

Scientists confusing absence of evidence with evidence of absence (i.e. "we don't have evidence of lab leaks, so anyone claiming it's a lab leak is definitely wrong") -> joke of a scientist

Scientists making a statement not from scientific evidence but due to political expediency (see sibling post, i.e. "conspiracy theories are making China unhappy and they might not share data with us") -> political actors

replies(1): >>mesozo+gkd
2. mesozo+gkd[view] [source] 2021-07-01 02:30:36
>>hnfong+(OP)
I was exactly as accurate as I thought :D and as you point out the meanings thanks for making it clearer.
[go to top]