zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. grader+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-06-06 02:52:10
I think maybe they have a phone, with the story in the browser history, and they want to link it to a wifi point.
replies(2): >>mcbutt+v2 >>strken+ub
◧
2. mcbutt+v2[view] [source] 2021-06-06 03:26:39
>>grader+(OP)
That seems plausible but I would think that there could be a lot of other sites the person visited that would be easier to track down. Maybe that’s what they did and the reason they’re dropping this subpoena.
replies(3): >>grader+B5 >>lauren+ge >>Izkata+li
◧◩
3. grader+B5[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-06 04:05:47
>>mcbutt+v2
That's what I think, yeah -- they cross-referenced the information anotherway (from another technical source or like you say, another site maybe) and withdrew.
◧
4. strken+ub[view] [source] 2021-06-06 05:48:40
>>grader+(OP)
It's also possible they've got a video or picture with the story open on a screen in the background.
◧◩
5. lauren+ge[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-06 06:36:26
>>mcbutt+v2
This is just a charitable guess. A guess with equal probability to anything.

Another guess is they want a precedent to subponea Fox News readers and classify people by political opinion. Albeit less charitable, it has equal probability.

◧◩
6. Izkata+li[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-06 07:48:00
>>mcbutt+v2
Article:

> was withdrawn after investigators found the person through other means

[go to top]