zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. bluGil+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-06-04 13:38:46
Yes, because you need to keep up the appearance of neutrality. If there is a conflict of interest, then you need to be careful to ensure that everyone knows you are ensuring those conflicts don't happen. That means you need to know and admit a lot of things that don't happen.

My company wants to know if my brother in law works for a competitor. It won't change my job, but they will be careful to ensure that I don't work on things that it would matter if I let something slip over dinner.

replies(1): >>jjeaff+1h2
2. jjeaff+1h2[view] [source] 2021-06-05 04:33:27
>>bluGil+(OP)
But what is it really in conflict with?

The only true conflict would be Fauci's opinion on whether the virus was a lab leak. Which really only matters for political reasons.

That conflict would have no bearing on how to handle the covid pandemic.

replies(1): >>bluGil+1o7
◧◩
3. bluGil+1o7[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-07 12:41:51
>>jjeaff+1h2
It does though. If it is a lab leak Fauci has to be fired for political reasons given that he made the mistake of funding the lab. Therefore he has incentive to hide evidence if it was.

We don't know that it was a lab leak or natural; and probably never will. There is the possibility the if it was a lab leak Fauci used his position to hide that evidence to protect himself.

Because of the above Fauci should have disclosed his potential conflict of interest. That way the rest of us can consider his actions to ensure we are more likely to catch him abusing his position.

The above is a normal thing that happens all the time. I'm accusing him of doing wrong by not disclosing this over a year ago. Do not expand that to accusing him of actually doing anything else wrong in handling the pandemic.

[go to top]