zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. isolli+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-06-04 08:59:08
There was censorship in the form of calling the hypothesis of a lab leak (distinct from the hypothesis of an engineered virus) a debunked conspiracy theory. The fact that the theory is considered acceptable again is what people are claiming vindication for, and rightly so.
replies(1): >>Siempr+ca
2. Siempr+ca[view] [source] 2021-06-04 11:23:56
>>isolli+(OP)
Someone telling you that your theory is wrong isn't censorship dude.
replies(1): >>isolli+vc
◧◩
3. isolli+vc[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-04 11:48:23
>>Siempr+ca
Saying that a theory is wrong is different from saying it's a conspiracy theory.

In the second case, you’re smearing proponents of the theory. That’s a form of censorship.

Doing it for a theory that was not in any way proven wrong (then or now) is professional misconduct.

[go to top]