zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Fomite+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-06-04 08:32:19
An alternative explanation is that the other COVID-19 narrative - that vaccines work, but those who are hesitant are essentially beyond convincing, and this is going to be both a long and boring years long slog to control globally and longer to find the origin - makes for exceedingly boring news.

On the other hand, talking about "If X is true, then..." and spending the rest of the section talking about the lab leak hypothesis as if it was true" is much more exciting.

Especially given there are now three "lab leak" camps - Bioweapon, GoF Gone Wrong, and Genuine Accidental Release of a Natural Virus all of whom claim they have the smoking gun for three mutually exclusive theories.

replies(1): >>calsy+I9
2. calsy+I9[view] [source] 2021-06-04 10:54:29
>>Fomite+(OP)
Where has ANYONE suggested lab leak is the 'truth' or they have a smoking gun. The news does not exclusively report on COVID either.
replies(2): >>tim333+Qt >>Fomite+OZ1
◧◩
3. tim333+Qt[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-04 13:53:25
>>calsy+I9
Maybe not here but check out https://thebulletin.org/2021/05/the-origin-of-covid-did-peop... and ^F for smoking gun. Good article by the way.
◧◩
4. Fomite+OZ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-04 21:45:23
>>calsy+I9
All over this thread, for one thing. Nate Silver and a number of other "data driven centrist" type commentators acting like there has been a massive shift in the weight of evidence. Dozens of "We're not saying this is true, but the next 10 pages will act entirely based on that supposition..." articles.
[go to top]