zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jtbayl+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-06-04 04:10:51
Would Fauci have known that gain of function research was now legal again?! Of course he would. Whether or not to fund that sort of risky research that has gone back and forth in legality is precisely the kind of thing that his job required him to know, isn't it?
replies(3): >>johnce+e >>Throwa+w >>thu211+zl
2. johnce+e[view] [source] 2021-06-04 04:13:19
>>jtbayl+(OP)
Yes, he knew. Here's the presentation he did on gain of function research back in January 2018 [1].

[1] https://twitter.com/ydeigin/status/1400321255824371714

3. Throwa+w[view] [source] 2021-06-04 04:15:44
>>jtbayl+(OP)
Right you are. But you're supposed to run grant proposals past a board which was created as part of the end of the funding moratorium, and it's been alleged this wasn't done, and that was routine for either Fauci's institute or the NIH as a whole.
4. thu211+zl[view] [source] 2021-06-04 08:43:32
>>jtbayl+(OP)
According to Wade's article it's actually even murkier than that. Only Fauci or one other person could have actually overridden the ban to keep the money flowing and prevent oversight of it:

The moratorium, referred to officially as a “pause,” specifically barred funding any gain-of-function research that increased the pathogenicity of the flu, MERS or SARS viruses. It defined gain-of-function very simply and broadly as “research that improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease.”

But then a footnote on p.2 of the moratorium document states that “An exception from the research pause may be obtained if the head of the USG funding agency determines that the research is urgently necessary to protect the public health or national security.”

This seemed to mean that either the director of the NIAID, Dr. Anthony Fauci, or the director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins, or maybe both, would have invoked the exemption in order to keep the money flowing to Dr. Shi’s gain-of-function research, and later to avoid notifying the Federal reporting system of her research.

replies(1): >>shkkmo+CU
◧◩
5. shkkmo+CU[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-06-04 14:29:22
>>thu211+zl
The moratorium was rescinded in 2017.
[go to top]