zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
2 comments
1. kaesar+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2021-06-04 01:28:17
We didn’t have the same confluence of other circumstantial evidence we do in this case. There’s no good reason to think Ebola came from a lab.
replies(1):
>>TchoBe+38
◧
2. TchoBe+38
[view]
[source]
2021-06-04 02:43:52
>>kaesar+(OP)
The point isn't "Ebola came from a lab" but rather "the fact that we can't pin down a natural origin doesn't prove it's man-made."
replies(1):
>>lmm+mb
◧◩
3. lmm+mb
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2021-06-04 03:16:54
>>TchoBe+38
It doesn't prove anything, but it shifts the balance of evidence.
[go to top]