zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. opwieu+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-05-25 22:05:03
Reinforced concrete has achieved regulatory capture via the building codes. If you try to build with anything non-standard, prepare to deal with a mountain of red tape.
replies(2): >>rsync+D1 >>Jweb_G+ab
2. rsync+D1[view] [source] 2021-05-25 22:16:10
>>opwieu+(OP)
I don't believe you would encounter any red tape if you used hot-dipped galvanized rebar - I believe it is code-compliant everywhere in North America.

It is, however, more expensive ...

replies(1): >>rdiddl+b5
◧◩
3. rdiddl+b5[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-25 22:38:42
>>rsync+D1
Yep and even that zinc coating has a lifespan.
4. Jweb_G+ab[view] [source] 2021-05-25 23:16:46
>>opwieu+(OP)
Given past "innovations" in the space of building materials, I think this is just about the last place people should be complaining about needing to comply with regulations...
replies(1): >>leoc+Tf
◧◩
5. leoc+Tf[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-25 23:47:08
>>Jweb_G+ab
And in fact it seems that one attempted fix to the corrosion problem, epoxy-coated rebar, has already proven much worse than uncoated rebar at dealing with rust in production: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVDy84rR5Z8

(That, BTW, is from a channel devoted to concrete made by a civil-engineering academic who specialises in the stuff https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrvfiHNDS_QI-FgKQSmTITQ )

[go to top]