zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. eloff+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-05-24 18:18:05
I didn't say you need to.

But looking at the sibling comment, you'd have to be right about it being ordinary not for general citizens but for experts in infectious disease - which is unlikely. Those kinds of people don't seek treatment for a virus unless it's serious. They already know there is no treatment. I even know that and don't seek treatment, and I'm no expert.

replies(1): >>sudosy+IE
2. sudosy+IE[view] [source] 2021-05-24 22:18:43
>>eloff+(OP)
It's not true that there is no treatment for the symptoms of viral infections. IV fluids, codeine, and ibuprofen will make you feel much better, even if it doesn't improve the underlying infection.

Those are exactly the things a Chinese hospital will administer.

If you were presenting to a hospital with Covid beyond what you might feel for a flu, you would be reporting difficulty breathing or loss of smell and taste.

However, they had symptoms consistent with seasonal illness.

So it's pretty obvious that the typical Chinese reaction is the best fit.

replies(1): >>eloff+PU
◧◩
3. eloff+PU[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-25 00:29:19
>>sudosy+IE
Not at all obvious. It's really your idea of how they would behave versus mine. I'd need to see more information to have a better idea of who's closer to the truth in this one.
replies(1): >>sudosy+de1
◧◩◪
4. sudosy+de1[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-25 04:18:11
>>eloff+PU
It's quite obvious. One interpretation conflicts with the available data, the others don't.

You can assume they were seriously sick with COVID beyond anything a flu or cold is likely to do. We know that this means either anosmia, difficulty breathing, and low blood oxygenation, with viral pneumonia visible on X-Ray.

None of these symptoms that characterize COVID serious enough to require medical attention, more than what one would expect from a bad flu or a bad cold, are compatible with the report citing symptoms consistent with seasonal illness.

There are two other possibilities.

One is that they had seasonal illnesses that were serious enough to require some medical attention, but not COVID. This is consistent with the report, and not implausible. This is just as possible whether they have similar attitudes towards medical attention for seasonal illness as other staff.

The other is that they had seasonal illnesses that were not very serious, but sought medical attention anyways. This is expected to happen if virology staff have similar attitudes towards the issue as the rest of Chinese society.

No matter which way you slice it, there is no indication they had COVID. Even if you remain ambivalent on their behaviour.

[go to top]