You mean every OS these days with a SSD?
This will make huge impact on people who can’t afford high end devices
And it really is less than 3 seconds straight to desktop UI and ready to use immediately, incredible.
My firewall is an AMD 5130 (pre Zen) with 4 GB RAM and a SATA SSD, running Debian stable with sysvinit. It reboots in less than 30 seconds, which means that most of the time TCP sessions passing through it stay up.
I'm baffled by people still claiming "desktop Linux hasn't arrived" when they put up with this shit.
I don't know, I've never tried to create a public forum for this kind of thing, but I'd bet you'd get more activity out of facebook than some bespoke web forum or IRC/Matrix/what have you.
If you don't enable this feature (which isn't enabled by default in Debian) you won't have this problem.
Matrix would be a much better choice IMO.
I don't think runit has an equivalent for `systemd-analyze blame`, but something is probably slowing things down by a lot.
But I don't see it as viable as a sole outreach platform for that reason.
We live in a disgusting scenario, we're held hostage by a racket.
In fact one of the reasons I use HN so much is because it's not doing any of that. And because I can choose what I read (rather than Facebook's algorithms deciding what appears on my timeline). I'm sure many people come here for that reason. This'll be a reason for the many anti-facebook sentiments. Because those sentiments are one of the reasons to come here :)
Turns out FB is capricious and has no problem pulling the rug out from under those companies and the communities they foster on Facebook without notice or recourse. Pages and groups with hundreds of thousands of followers can be wiped off FB and there's nothing your business can do about it.
If I were in their shoes, I'd just use FB as a funnel to an online property that I own and control.
https://board.kolibrios.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2315
Finally, some simple, lightweight, non-patronizing software. Definitively going to try it out soon.
Nowadays startup under 10 seconds is more of a hinder than a gain. My 2 cents
Its my new BeOS5 :)
Do you use an IDE that makes things easier?
I remember doing very simple programs in asm during college, but it wasn't anywhere near this complex.
Any resources or articles that touch on this topic would be appreciated!
Start with this https://gpfault.net/posts/asm-tut-0.txt.html
NetBSD is a bit easier to run on 8MB systems these days. Still not super easy, but less fat to trim off. I think you might still need to trim down the default kernel, but at least there is a premade config for that (GENERIC_TINY)
If you're daring, it should work on 4 MB machines... ;)
Now, it's entirely possible that even with this minimal config it'll take up too much space, but it may work. I got NetBSD 8 to run on a VAX with 8MB of RAM, although that kernel has many fewer drivers/modules.
They also released an (affordable!) book recently, covering several architectures.
yes, my Linux kernel is 3.4M, bz2 compressed. Unfortunately, some things are no more possible to get removed from the kernel, like the xattr in ext4.
This is not criticism, just a statement.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MenuetOS [1] http://board.flatassembler.net/topic.php?p=216272#216272
It's worse in every way. It's not even close to something as polished as Discord.
1. "Open in browser" is a good start, but then the registration process is downright painful. Discord doesn't require you to register at all to try it out, just to pick a nickname, it's vastly better for onboarding.
2. Requires unique nicknames. A chat app with unique nicks? this has to be a joke right?
3. As usual with FOSS, the worst part is the UI/UX. The whole design is extremely confusing. At first glance it appears the app only supports 'rooms'. But it seems that there are 'communities' and 'spaces' too? I have no idea what's going on. Discord just has servers with channels and private messages and it's all clearly indicated in the UI.
Listen, I do want to use open and free alternatives if possible. But let's be realistic and stop pretending that something like Matrix is anywhere near Discord. A more reasonable alternative would be Zulip.
> Currently Menuet is the only OS written 100% in assembly with modern feature-set and it took us some time to realize this goal. This is also an easily identifiable place in the computing world.
> And like always, if somebody wants to be part of Menuet development, then just send me a message.
I'm sorry, you say that as though Linux Desktop doesn't have a giant pile of its own shit to put up with. Windows definitely isn't perfect, but I'll still take its shit any day over Linux Desktop's.
That doesn't imply it's [entirely] true, but it certainly warrants some analysis. It's not clear what exactly happened without digging. As of today, one of the core files (`kernel.asm`[¹]) is clear about licensing, but the history may have been "not straightforward".
¹=http://websvn.kolibrios.org/filedetails.php?repname=Kolibri+...
(Really I'd like to see something with the same kind of weird and divergent ideas as TempleOS but in a more accessible package)
But they do have an excellent solution to the whole updates debacle: Install them in a separate location, initialise them when booting or when they're finished installing, and delete them when they're inaccessible from a few standard locations like /boot or /proc.
Even if the original license doesn't block this, it is still a bit of a dick move IMO.
And it's "obvious", or more correct in the context "obviously"
Not hating on SVN, just think the “why aren’t they using a more modern/superior X” should be taken in that context.
>why aren’t they using a more modern/superior X
Because no one cares if it's not superior for that case.
The line you quoted, I had in quotation marks because it was essentially the question of the parent thread, not because it was my stance.
"That context" meant that they started with tools like SVN for version control, and Facebook for their community. They were 'current' at the time and they probably haven't seen a reason to switch.
I have no problem with this. I use many tools people find uncool or outdated. I still use RCS in places and like it better for those particular use cases (eg Bind DNS zone files), where things like file locking and versioning files vs codebases are features and not detriments. I have shell scripts I've carried around for 10-15 years to support it (ironically kept in git now), and I don't feel like reengineering for a git/ci workflow to get back to feature parity.
You should look into the history of RCS->CVS->SVN (and revision control systems in general) to understand the nuances there.
Take it into context? If there is no befit why waste your energy?
>You should look into the history of RCS->CVS->SVN (and revision control systems in general) to understand the nuances there.
I don't know what you want to say. Newer is better? Distributed is the only way to go? Mongo better then sqlite?
It's a source control system, and if it matches your organization good, if not change it.