zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. Siempr+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-05-07 15:06:47
Do you know if the early (March 2020) phylogenetic work[1] that showed that the most ancestral genomes extracted from early human samples weren't from Wuhan has stood up to scrutiny?

I just have a hard time understanding why so clear evidence of the epidemic starting outside Wuhan is missing from the debate, so I'd appreciate if you could comment on it.

[1] https://www.pnas.org/content/117/17/9241

replies(1): >>COGlor+pg
2. COGlor+pg[view] [source] 2021-05-07 16:34:14
>>Siempr+(OP)
In my opinion this is the single strongest piece of evidence against the lab-leak hypothesis (and it also refutes the whole "furin-site uses non-canonical amino acids which shows evidence of human involvement" hypothesis as well). I haven't found anything disproving it, and I have looked a fair bit. However, epidemiology is not anything I know about, so I'm about on the same level as anyone else there.
[go to top]