zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. COGlor+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-05-07 14:12:28
Primarily Occam's razor. The total area available to coronaviruses in the wild to replicate and mutate in is orders of magnitude greater than the area available in a laboratory.
replies(2): >>raducu+he >>kansfa+2v
2. raducu+he[view] [source] 2021-05-07 15:29:32
>>COGlor+(OP)
But weren't they doing that exact thing in the Wuhan laboratory -- making coronaviruses infect humanized cells(with the ACE2 receptor)?

Wouldn't the fact that it started in Wuhan point the razor in the direction of lab-escape theory?

replies(1): >>COGlor+Cq
◧◩
3. COGlor+Cq[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-07 16:32:03
>>raducu+he
It tilts the needle, yes, but there are numerous other pieces of evidence that tilt it in the other direction. Hence the 90%/10% split in my mind. But I won't fault anyone else for having a different split. I think that's reasonable.
4. kansfa+2v[view] [source] 2021-05-07 16:53:01
>>COGlor+(OP)
I am not an expert in the field, but I don’t find this math convincing - I arrive at the opposite conclusion. This was not a random lab and the outbreak didn’t just start anywhere.
[go to top]