zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. notris+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-05-07 13:30:00
Setting the actual tragic pandemic to one side.

It is not true that there are never going to be reasonable motivations to deploy a virus:-

It could be viewed as a tool to alter population demographics in an ageing society.

It might be deployed against an adversary.

It might be used to reduce the human population to avoid a predicted ecological disaster.

There are probably dozens of very reasonable motivations.

replies(1): >>dideri+y6
2. dideri+y6[view] [source] 2021-05-07 14:06:53
>>notris+(OP)
That’s a stronger claim than I was making; I don’t think it’s categorically unreasonable to assume there’s motivation to intentionally release a virus.

I think it’s unreasonable to think there was a motivation to intentionally release Covid.

I don’t think there’s reasonable motivation given when and where the outbreak started, how the virus works, China’s response, etc.

I think the particular scenarios you’re painting are also quite extreme/unlikely, so any claim that a virus was released intentionally would require extraordinary evidence in most cases/I’d rarely entertain that hypothesis. There are less drastic and risky ways with less blowback of dealing with all of those issues, even if you assume a very capable bad actor and ignore the normal and expected amount of incompetence and error.

replies(1): >>notris+qu
◧◩
3. notris+qu[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-07 16:17:16
>>dideri+y6
Right, I agree with you completely on Covid.
[go to top]