zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. rlpb+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-05-07 12:35:58
> The fact is that an epidemic with a corona virus (never before or since seen in the wild) with a peculiarly efficient ability to infect humans started in the _only city in the world with a lab where gain-of-function experiments on corona viruses_ is located. Just apply occam’s razor, and then you are done.

What's the reason the lab is located in that city? Is there an underlying causal connection?

For example, is Wuhan prone to novel coronoviruses because of the local bat population, and so that was the logical place to site a coronavirus research lab?

If so, Occam's Razor would suggest that common connection as the more simple explanation.

replies(3): >>varjag+f1 >>40four+m1 >>himinl+u3
2. varjag+f1[view] [source] 2021-05-07 12:48:12
>>rlpb+(OP)
It's not. The officially suspect bat population was some 800km away from Wuhan.

Similarly, Sverdlovsk lab (the ground zero of 1979 anthrax outbreak) wasn't located there because Sverdlovsk specifically suspect to anthrax. An interesting tidbit, the party blamed the local farmer (wet) market for the outbreak there.

3. 40four+m1[view] [source] 2021-05-07 12:49:31
>>rlpb+(OP)
The idea that the bat population is local to Wuhan is a misconception. The bats from which the gain of function research studies are being done were collected from Yunnan province 800 miles away, not locally in Wuhan. They still have not been able to identity any animals in the market, bats or civets, that would explain the natural spillover hypothesis.
replies(1): >>rlpb+jD
4. himinl+u3[view] [source] 2021-05-07 13:06:08
>>rlpb+(OP)
> What's the reason the lab is located in that city? Is there an underlying causal connection?

I thought so initially, but then:

1. look at the size of China; even assuming bats are found only in half of it, and maybe that Wuhan has more bats than other cities, that's still pretty fucking unlucky.

2. the bats in question are not from the same province anyway

◧◩
5. rlpb+jD[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-07 16:24:43
>>40four+m1
I'm not trying to claim otherwise. My point is that an underlying connection, if one exists, would make the gp's Occam's Razor argument moot.
replies(1): >>40four+4c7
◧◩◪
6. 40four+4c7[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-05-10 04:59:32
>>rlpb+jD
Fair enough. I was mostly trying to point out there is no ‘local’ bat population tied to coronavirus. I appreciate you’re trying to look at it with critical thinking though.

I don’t know the reason that lab is located in Wuhan specifically. But if you want to find the answer, I think you have to look into who funded the research.

[go to top]