zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. loveis+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-04-09 21:41:27
>But you know what's interesting about that?

>We know about the CoV-1 leak because /the chinese scientists told us about it./

Sometimes humans tell the truth, sometimes humans don't.

Pointing to one group of people who told the truth, and asserting that means another group must be telling the truth is just silly.

Especially considering the former example was in regards to a small accident relative to potentially the greatest accident in human history.

I know I would be strongly inclined to lie if I was responsible for the accidental death of millions of people.

If a human being was not inclined to lie about their responsibility for greatest accident in human history, why would humans ever lie about any mistake?

replies(1): >>jedueh+x1
2. jedueh+x1[view] [source] 2021-04-09 21:53:38
>>loveis+(OP)
But at the time when it was important, in both of these leak events, only extremely few people had died. Not millions.

It was far from the worst accident in human history at that point, it looked like nothing and in America lots of people thought it would never affect us at all.

That's when it came up and when Zhengli had her lab searched and checked their freezers etc.

It's also important to think about the other BSL4 labs around the world they sent tons of samples to. If they were hiding SARS-CoV-2, why wouldn't it have slipped into any of these many thousands of inter-lab samples?

Releases aren't all that common but cross-contamination within and between secure sites actually is.

Why has no one found SARS-2 in any of the samples sent out of Wuhan to Australia, Singapore, Canada, or the US?

[go to top]