zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. ccozan+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-29 10:58:47
Still, is kind of "weapon" that is hold like in deterrence.

See #metoo, where facts were kept hidden, until the society was actually prepared to accept the truth, because at that time, a woman would have been laughed in face, for accusing a man of sexism in the 70's ....

replies(1): >>Aussie+Vm
2. Aussie+Vm[view] [source] 2021-03-29 13:36:15
>>ccozan+(OP)
Using your weapon analogy, she is both "disarming" herself to the fullest extent possible and providing nukes to other nations to ensure mutually assured destruction in the event she is holding a concealed weapon. What more can she feasibly do?
replies(1): >>timesl+O4a
◧◩
3. timesl+O4a[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-04-01 10:24:25
>>Aussie+Vm
It's not what she can feasibly do, there are no points for effort- even when the effort is admirable. It's how the risk/reward dynamics end up looking.
[go to top]