zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. threwa+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-29 00:10:34
Completely agree, in the face of a person who is possibly hostile, or just in general a person that generates a lot of uncertainty what incentive could you give me not to stay silent?

People need to think about it in terms of incentives, what incentive do I have to try communicating with an incredible mindfulness and scrutiny that I might then fail at. The failure to do so properly could have potentially endless downsides? The default incentive is always going to be avoidance as much as possible. Not because of any desire to be sexist, but because is the instinctive path of least resistance.

replies(1): >>Dyslex+UY
2. Dyslex+UY[view] [source] 2021-03-29 11:15:42
>>threwa+(OP)
> or just in general a person that generates a lot of uncertainty what incentive could you give me not to stay silent?

not OP but the silence is a feature that allows you to actively listen[1] which is impossible when trying to come up with an answer while the other person still speaks.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_listening

replies(1): >>threwa+4B2
◧◩
3. threwa+4B2[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-29 18:33:16
>>Dyslex+UY
I don't think anyone is accusing people of not listening to each other, at least not in the context of this thread. The issue is people actively listen, and then decline to provide any meaningful feedback on what they just heard as a means to avoid controversy. Me listening to someone doesn't do much good if I decline to contribute to the conversation afterwards.
[go to top]