zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. kenjac+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-28 22:07:34
“but I think there was still much more interesting discussion going on publicly in years past.”

Really? Prior to anonymous Internet comments there were even fewer discussions. I think recent years is when we’ve finally began to understand how people really feel.

replies(1): >>skjfdo+n4
2. skjfdo+n4[view] [source] 2021-03-28 22:36:20
>>kenjac+(OP)
You are correct. I should have limited my statement to discussions between people using their real identities. I also think this is subjective depending on how much value you place on being able to identify the participants. For example, in language related discussions I think it's extremely valuable to have people like SPJ, Anders Hejlsberg, Andrei Alexandrescu etc. as active AND identifiable participants. When I was in high school, during the very early days of Slashdot, quite a few highly respected developers, professors and authors would comment regularly under their own names. Reading their comments and having discussions with them definitely changed my life and I think it would be sad to see all these discussions move into private spaces or under anonymity due to fear of the mob.
replies(1): >>kenjac+WQ
◧◩
3. kenjac+WQ[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-29 06:53:24
>>skjfdo+n4
I don’t think they fear the mob. They fear wasting their time. Where there are quality discussions you will still see lively discussions. Math is an area where top experts will still discuss online. It’s because they are less likely to be inundated with clowns.

Pop culture and politics is where the mob culture resides.

replies(1): >>skjfdo+kW
◧◩◪
4. skjfdo+kW[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-29 08:07:11
>>kenjac+WQ
> I don't think they fear the mob.

I vehemently disagree. In my experience, a very substantial number of them fear the mob because there's so much at stake and nobody is interested in falling on their sword. Many people want to talk politics and philosophy and those subjects are often hard to avoid unless conversation is heavily restricted. I've had tons of conversations about algorithms that naturally turn into discussions of political and philosophical ramifications. A substantial amount of the screening that goes into accessing private communities revolves directly around likelihood of charitable interpretation, secrecy and behaviour on public social networks.

replies(1): >>kenjac+sm2
◧◩◪◨
5. kenjac+sm2[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-29 16:26:09
>>skjfdo+kW
I disagree. In fact I spent some time looking online and I think there are more technical discussion I've ever seen online. There is more open source code then ever before and most of that discussion happens in the open. Many of the biggest contributors have these discussions online. I simply haven't seen the discussions disappear from public view as you seem to. Maybe you just aren't looking hard enough to find them?
[go to top]