zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. rocqua+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-28 21:15:40
One explanation here is certainly the media being sensationalist for sensation's sake. An alternative is that some in media might think the crackdown on sexism is bad. Hence they focus on the bad effects. Whether this is explicit propaganda or honest reporting on what they consider the more important issue almost seems like a semantic question.

I suspect both elements play a role. How big a role I have little idea.

replies(1): >>sneak+ne
2. sneak+ne[view] [source] 2021-03-28 22:52:37
>>rocqua+(OP)
> One explanation here is certainly the media being sensationalist for sensation's sake.

Sadly I think it may be for profits, for survival's sake. The media business is very different now than it was pre-Zuckerberg.

[go to top]