zlacker

I think it mostly is, we're just not always happy about which countries actually are in the "authoritarian" bucket

>>willia+(OP)
most modern governments did similar stuff in the past few decades. I 'm having trouble thinking of one that didn't.

You can call them all authoritarian, but then the word loses all meaning, you would just say "any strong modern government is authoritarian"

>>flaviu+oa
Switzerland's government isn't authoritarian. The Swiss government is the whole adult population. Every Swiss citizen over 18 can propose and vote on laws. No subset of Swiss people can force other Swiss people to do anything without approval from Swiss voters.

>>mkolod+bf
The Swiss government is pretty democratic as far as governments go, I didn't think of it. But now that you mentioned it I can tell a couple of things that are pretty reprehensible, without even searching on Google:

- taking away kids from "bad" families and sending them in foster care just to be used as slaves by the foster homes. Apparently the slavery part was pretty widespread in the 70s. Granted, this is not happening anymore

- a colleague of mine did prison time because he refused to enroll in the army based on personal beliefs. Now you can do community service instead, but that prison time was not that long ago.

Just because you have approval from the majority of Swiss, it doesn't make it right to do either of those 2 things. It's the kind of stuff authoritarians do. I am pretty sure I can find much more dirt if I use Google, I just used what I know first or second hand.