zlacker

>I don’t think most female founders even realize that they’re getting different advice than their male counterparts. Silicon Valley has always run on candor, but it’s being stifled at the moment, and no one is noticing that we are the collateral damage.

Imagine what it's like being the intended target and not just "collateral damage". It's not a problem that men are nervous to be candid but it's a problem that women are feeling the secondary effects of that?

>>2OEH8e+(OP)
I know a couple of female founders (including my wife). The biggest problem is that female might run into a creep and that makes very very stressful experience. For me... it is easy. First creeps do not want to meet me (I’m fat, older guy, short,..), and if I do meet somebody who is giving me creeps - my experience is not stressful at all.

Btw, I still have not met a female VC: after 22 years in SV.

>>tlogan+N7
You've never met a female VC? We just raised our second round and we have 4 women VC's or angels on the captable now. Maybe it's just based on industry. I'm in sports/media tech.

>>2OEH8e+(OP)
Please don't take HN threads further into gender flamewar.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

>>dang+Sx
THIS is the comment you deemed taking the thread into a gender flamewar?

Not the dozens of other posts throughout this thread of people making unequivocal statements about how A) one cannot speak to women or minorities anymore without being accused of discrimination, B) how "every" (or some variation of that summary) minority/woman are hurting their cause with constant insistence of discrimination?

Dang, just because someone is civil, does not mean they are logical. Just because they are logical, doesn't mean they are correct.

There are folks all throughout this thread right now that are making broad general summaries of misogynistic and racist talking points, but you are not warning ANY of htem.

>>deanCo+e91
I posted dozens of moderation comments in this thread.