zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. datafl+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-28 13:31:52
Do you just assume without clicking that every rebuttal to your point must be only addressing deliberate, malicious dissemination of the virus? I even went out of my way to quote the relevant parts of it here so you could immediately see the lack of "intent" without clicking:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26610037

replies(1): >>dang+fQ
2. dang+fQ[view] [source] 2021-03-28 19:33:16
>>datafl+(OP)
Please omit personal swipes and don't take threads further into flamewar. Those things don't help. If another comment is interpreting you inaccurately or otherwise in error, provide correct information respectfully. If you can't (or don't want to) do that, it's better not to post until you can (and do).
[go to top]