zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. incrud+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-28 12:59:10
> Nobody ever dismissed it.

You must've missed out on previous HN discussions. I remember these guys in particular being paraded around:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBQplOe8-LE

I did find their tone quite dismissive, and the verdict in the title leaves little room for interpretation.

> What was dangerous was pointing the finger at China and saying “this is all their fault!” without any evidence.

True, but that's irrelevant to the plausibility of the hypothesis.

> There STILL is not evidence, but that doesn’t mean it should not be investigated as a source.

Arguably, it's still dangerous to do exactly that.

replies(1): >>beowul+e2
2. beowul+e2[view] [source] 2021-03-28 13:19:05
>>incrud+(OP)
I think a lot of the confusion, based on the responses to my comment, is separating the idea that the virus was CREATED in a lab from it being accidentally released from the lab. The former implies intent and carries a lot of secondary implications about bioweapons and political maneuverings. It is a hefty claim.

The latter is simpler—it is reasonable to think a lab that maintains and studies viruses similar to Covid-19 accidentally allowed one to be released. It does not imply an intent to misuse the virus.

I have not watched the video, I’m sorry. I’ll try and get to it later.

replies(1): >>incrud+B3
◧◩
3. incrud+B3[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-28 13:27:51
>>beowul+e2
> The former implies intent...

It doesn't imply intent to use as a bioweapon, much less release it in their own population.

The hypothesis that this was a gain-of-function experiment that went awry due to lax security still does put a lot of pressure on Chinese authorities, on top of the poor handling at the beginning of the outbreak.

[go to top]