zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. pmille+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-22 21:45:55
Then, why wasn't evidence uncovered earlier? Surely the theory had just as much plausibility a year ago as today.

Are you asking me to believe a theory for which all the evidence was either not uncovered or destroyed? Why is that more plausible than origin from outside the lab?

replies(1): >>koheri+KV1
2. koheri+KV1[view] [source] 2021-03-23 14:02:26
>>pmille+(OP)
I mean, isn't that obvious? The Chinese did not allow anyone to investigate WIV because they don't want to be blamed.

I agree that conclusions should not be drawn without evidence - but by the same token, you cannot rule this out as a possibility because no effort was put into investigating it.

[go to top]