zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. ninken+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-22 21:13:17
Epicenters of a disease like this (respiratory disease with asymptomatic transmission) are likely to be in an urban area, so it's not surprising it's in a large city.

In a typical city the size of Wuhan, what are the odds it has some sort of viral research lab? If this happened in (picking a city at random...) Chicago, you could work backwards, find a viral research lab in say, University of Illinois, and make the same claim. "No link to animal transmission has been found, and the original epicenter was known to have a viral research lab. QED."

replies(1): >>varjag+s1
2. varjag+s1[view] [source] 2021-03-22 21:18:54
>>ninken+(OP)
Well, we know for a fact that the outbreak started in Wuhan, not in Chicago. Had it happened in Chicago, am certain the university lab would be under suspicion.

And no, the vast majority of cities do not have viral research labs.

[go to top]