zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. dang+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-22 19:59:37
"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

replies(1): >>stonog+W4
2. stonog+W4[view] [source] 2021-03-22 20:19:06
>>dang+(OP)
Hi dang,

I am curious to know if this guideline applies only when responding to HN comments, or if it should be applied to source material in article links as well. I've noticed a lot more conspiracy-theorizing comments lately and it's hard to engage when the whole premise of a given comment is accusing someone else of misrepresenting facts.

Thanks for all your hard work, regardless!

replies(2): >>koheri+uh >>dang+Sp
◧◩
3. koheri+uh[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-22 21:09:22
>>stonog+W4
I'm not Dang, but I think it's a generally good life lesson that should apply always.
◧◩
4. dang+Sp[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-22 21:44:08
>>stonog+W4
It totally applies to the articles too. That wasn't in my mind when we introduced that guideline but it turns out to apply just as nicely at that level.
[go to top]