zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. 40four+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-06 06:08:07
I appreciate you disclosing your experience in the ad-tech industry. But I’m not sure I understand your point.

It sounds like from your experience, the concept of FLoC from the main article is exactly where Google and other want to be? They want legit population samples versus the ‘noise’ of huge amounts of random individual use data?

But when they are trying to market it to us as users, as a ‘privacy win’, that’s hard to swallow when you’re saying their end goal is some sort of ‘govtech’ or ‘social credit’ system.

replies(1): >>otabde+n72
2. otabde+n72[view] [source] 2021-03-07 06:35:10
>>40four+(OP)
> It sounds like from your experience, the concept of FLoC from the main article is exactly where Google and other want to be?

Yes, if it can be made into some objective standard, and not just another "trust me, I'm Google".

> But when they are trying to market it to us as users, as a ‘privacy win’, that’s hard to swallow when you’re saying their end goal is some sort of ‘govtech’ or ‘social credit’ system.

Yes, because Google is not just an adtech company. Obviously they are more than that. (Or at least they want to be.)

[go to top]