zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. dontbl+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-05 01:41:00
If this is truly what you want, then what is your suggestion for financing the existence of sites that wish to stay afloat? Paywalls don't work.
replies(2): >>mulmen+g6 >>wpietr+SC1
◧
2. mulmen+g6[view] [source] 2021-03-05 02:25:45
>>dontbl+(OP)
Wikipedia doesn't have ads or paywalls.
replies(1): >>zamfi+l7
◧◩
3. zamfi+l7[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-05 02:35:20
>>mulmen+g6
It absolutely has ads, for a few weeks every year, for itself.
replies(2): >>querul+Ir >>mulmen+2Wp
◧◩◪
4. querul+Ir[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-05 05:22:38
>>zamfi+l7
people tautologically define ads as only that which they don't wish to see
◧
5. wpietr+SC1[view] [source] 2021-03-05 15:07:22
>>dontbl+(OP)
Paywalls don't work? Tell that to the WSJ, the NYT, Netflix, Disney, and so on. They all do just fine.
◧◩◪
6. mulmen+2Wp[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-13 23:12:31
>>zamfi+l7
Those are solicitations for donations. Wikipedia isn’t selling anything.
[go to top]