zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. izacus+(OP)[view] [source] 2021-03-04 17:37:30
And do you consider a complete ban of 100B+ advertising industry and complete ban of tracking (happily used by governments) a likely outcome?

Even the mighty Apple still tracks analytics data and separates that into a separate switch from the ones limiting non-Apple tracking.

replies(2): >>fitbli+w7 >>SahAss+Dl
2. fitbli+w7[view] [source] 2021-03-04 18:06:52
>>izacus+(OP)
Not how opinions and politics stand now, but that is part of the reason why articles like this are important. There is quite a distance to travel between writing an article criticizing tracking + the technology that enables it and arriving at legislation.
replies(1): >>izacus+s9
◧◩
3. izacus+s9[view] [source] [discussion] 2021-03-04 18:14:21
>>fitbli+w7
I might be traitor to the cause, but I feel like giving the industry an "out" might be easier to achieve and significantly faster to implement - e.g. instead of complete ban on targeted advertising, standardize on a clientside API that can send a list of topics/themes that are interesting to the person. In a way that's not owned by a single corporation.

This way I feel there will be less legislative and lobbying pushback while still achieving major privacy wins.

4. SahAss+Dl[view] [source] 2021-03-04 19:07:52
>>izacus+(OP)
This is not about banning ads or analytics.
[go to top]