zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. avmich+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-12-31 00:22:27
Most often I see this as an example of ISO 8061 date, https://www.iso.org/iso-8601-date-and-time-format.html .

"Looking for an unambiguous calendar-and-clock format that is internationally understood? It’s time for ISO 8601."

"ISO 8601 tackles this uncertainty by setting out an internationally agreed way to represent dates:

YYYY-MM-DD

For example, September 27, 2012 is represented as 2012-09-27."

replies(2): >>titzer+y7 >>sargun+kh
2. titzer+y7[view] [source] 2020-12-31 01:27:47
>>avmich+(OP)
Yes, yes, yes, please use ISO 8601! Big-endian is the only rational way to sort dates and it combines nicely with time-of-day as well.
replies(1): >>sargun+gr
3. sargun+kh[view] [source] 2020-12-31 02:58:48
>>avmich+(OP)
Yep. Although I don’t use ISO8601 for time stamps when communicating online (for 2021-03-01T00:00Z is more confusing to me than 2021-03-01 16:00 PST8PDT), it’s easier to use for dates when discussing in an online forum where people may be from outside of the US.
replies(1): >>grzm+Sh
◧◩
4. grzm+Sh[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-12-31 03:05:12
>>sargun+kh
nit: ISO8601 permits offsets: you don't need to always use UTC/Z. 2021-03-01T16:00-0800 works just fine.
replies(1): >>sargun+cr
◧◩◪
5. sargun+cr[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-12-31 04:56:36
>>grzm+Sh
I can’t remember the time zone offset between PST and PDT, and when the switch happens.
replies(1): >>grzm+or
◧◩
6. sargun+gr[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-12-31 04:57:41
>>titzer+y7
Big endian is also much easier to read as someone who reads from left to right.
◧◩◪◨
7. grzm+or[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-12-31 04:58:52
>>sargun+cr
Well, I'm with you there :) I'm all for getting rid of twice-yearly (biannual? semi-annual? perhaps hemi-annual?) offset changes!
[go to top]