zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. ikeboy+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-12-30 23:23:11
Ah yes, technically the chemicals are being put in the water and are turning the frogs gay but you see, they only intended to put the chemicals in the water and didn't specifically intend to turn the frogs gay.
replies(3): >>katman+O >>peterm+R >>MattGa+11
2. katman+O[view] [source] 2020-12-30 23:28:10
>>ikeboy+(OP)
Atrazine isn't intentionally put into water, it ending up in water reservoirs is a second order effect of its primary use as an herbicide. Its subsequent tertiary effects on the ecosystem are far removed from the people who applied it, who were just looking for an easy way to kill weeds.
3. peterm+R[view] [source] 2020-12-30 23:28:30
>>ikeboy+(OP)
That is a misquote. He implied human social engineering potentially as a side effect.

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Alex_Jones

4. MattGa+11[view] [source] 2020-12-30 23:29:19
>>ikeboy+(OP)
The chemicals are not being intentionally put in the water at all. They are sprayed onto plants and then run off into the water. Atrazine is a herbicide.
replies(1): >>ikeboy+02
◧◩
5. ikeboy+02[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-12-30 23:37:33
>>MattGa+11
Fair point, so the intentionality is one level back
[go to top]