zlacker

Moreover, is it really so difficult to imagine that there are still people that don't like publicity these days?

>>teeker+(OP)
Yeah, I just cannot comprehend what is going on in this discussion. Is this the same HN that hates Facebook for all of its privacy issues? But the people in some small village somehow forfeited their right to privacy because a few hundred years ago it was named something that now sounds funny to people in a different language?

It's bizarre.

>>teeker+(OP)
> there are still people that don't like publicity these days

Yes, but they don't post about it online, so no-one hears from them. They might even choose to live in a village with a 3-digit population count.

>>Doreen+t1
That’s nonsensical. Because the town’s name is mildly meme worthy, these people are forfeiting their right to privacy? Sorry, what? And how is Facebook even remotely related to this discussion?

>>read_i+te
I think you're mistreading the parent comment. And oddly too, because you do the same thing. You don't mean "these people are forfeiting their right to privacy" literally, do you? it's the opposite. Neither does the parent, it's a question, implied that the answer is "of course not!"

You made that even clearer with "Sorry, what?" but parent comment only make sense if that addendum is assumed.

>>Sidebu+mv
Thanks for pointing that out, I see where you're coming from, but GP's other comments make it seem like a serious statement to me.