zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. part1o+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-11-10 22:18:39
> site’s anti-abuse systems, many of which Bell and Gackle have written themselves.

That sounds interesting! How were these built? In the same Arc language? Any chance this can be open sourced?

replies(1): >>dang+B
2. dang+B[view] [source] 2020-11-10 22:21:12
>>part1o+(OP)
In Arc, yes.

Unfortunately not, because we don't know how to write anti-abuse systems that keep working once people know what they are.

replies(2): >>dwd+X7 >>part1o+qE
◧◩
3. dwd+X7[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-11-10 23:06:45
>>dang+B
Unfortunate but very true; it's always interesting to see what other people have in their bag of tricks - but a magician should never tell.

I would guess that you have rules based on patterns of observed behaviour, and that they do 80-90% of the effective blocking.

◧◩
4. part1o+qE[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-11-11 03:47:45
>>dang+B
I get it, thanks. Instead, Could you write about them, rather than the code? I'm picturing lessons learned, don't try ABC it's a waste of time, and so on..
replies(1): >>webmav+AT
◧◩◪
5. webmav+AT[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-11-11 07:32:34
>>part1o+qE
I'd actually like to see a series of 'lessons learned', or 'things we tried that didn't work' (including code, if possible/prudent).
[go to top]