zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. Jon_Lo+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-10-15 19:47:43
Tell that to the cities who see their infrastructure fall apart after 20 years and can't finance rebuilding it stronger and cheaper.
replies(1): >>lallys+9e
2. lallys+9e[view] [source] 2020-10-15 20:59:25
>>Jon_Lo+(OP)
How little infrastructure works they have if they had to pay for it to be 1000x overbuilt?
replies(1): >>Jon_Lo+Ij
◧◩
3. Jon_Lo+Ij[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-10-15 21:23:55
>>lallys+9e
there probably is a middle ground. Just because i disagree with the rather radical opinion that claims it's most efficient to just barely fulfill minimum requirement and that throw-away & buy-new should be considered for civil engineering doesn't automatically mean i favor the radical extreme opposite opinion.

I am just stating the very obvious problem.

replies(1): >>lallys+8F
◧◩◪
4. lallys+8F[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-10-15 23:20:22
>>Jon_Lo+Ij
I think ultimately the problem is that infra is an investment in future growth, but the decision makers aren't accountable on failure.
[go to top]