zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. market+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-10-15 14:33:40
If this topic turns out to be the start of a FOSS, I'll join as a (senior) design engineer.

Find one that doesn't have a patent and reverse engineer it.

I imagine the first/original control system was extremely difficult to develop. But since the technology already exists you can reverse engineer it.

After that, you pay a supplier to make parts. In my experience, these suppliers will end up redesigning to match better with their process, but still meets critical specifications.

I'd post my contact info, but I believe I'm targeted by an HN mod.

replies(2): >>webmav+ni >>andrew+4Y1
2. webmav+ni[view] [source] 2020-10-15 16:10:16
>>market+(OP)
> Find one that doesn't have a patent and reverse engineer it

At this point, it would be better to start looking at expired (and about-to-expire) patents. A circa Y2k printer would be a perfectly acceptable design, IMO.

replies(1): >>market+Zz
◧◩
3. market+Zz[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-10-15 17:32:36
>>webmav+ni
I completely agree. But given I got 4 downvotes for offering to contribute to a FOSS, seems like demand is low.
replies(1): >>Initia+lJ
◧◩◪
4. Initia+lJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-10-15 18:17:36
>>market+Zz
I'd be willing to bet you got those downvotes for an unverifiable and unlikely allegation that an HN mod is currently targeting you.

Glancing back through your posts, I see pretty clear reasons why people would have downvoted your gray ones.

5. andrew+4Y1[view] [source] 2020-10-16 01:52:54
>>market+(OP)
Do you think I need to be an HN mod to downvote you? I don't.
[go to top]