zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. nearbu+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-09-30 05:10:43
>> It's more of an appeal to emotion than a rational reason.

> But that is precisely the rational reason.

I'm not following your reasoning here. You list several logical reasons why digital privacy is important (it protects us from nefarious governments, it protects us from violent spouses, etc.). What does this have to do with an irrational embarrassment over pooping?

replies(2): >>atoav+Bb >>camehe+aw
◧
2. atoav+Bb[view] [source] 2020-09-30 08:06:30
>>nearbu+(OP)
The rational argument is: we don't want to live in a society where the private is potentially intruded by other outside actors, because in our notion of liberty the individual shall be able to live a life without having to fear these intrusions.

Whether this fear is rational doesn't matter. Whether these intrusions are never actually carried out and always only remain a faint possibility, a story the actors make you believe doesn't matter.

◧
3. camehe+aw[view] [source] 2020-09-30 12:05:30
>>nearbu+(OP)
Freedom of expression includes the freedom to be irrationally embarrassed about anything, or indeed irrational about anything at all. As long as you're not hurting anyone I guess.
[go to top]