zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. MaxBar+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-08-18 16:50:27
And if she were paid less, Mozilla Corporation could spend that money on its mission.
replies(1): >>marcin+R
2. marcin+R[view] [source] 2020-08-18 16:54:08
>>MaxBar+(OP)
Which in the context of how Mozilla deals with donations is a separate and unrelated discussion.

edit: More broadly, pointing out someone as making a false statement does not mean you agree with the opposite view, simply that you don't like people spreading false statements.

replies(1): >>MaxBar+43
◧◩
3. MaxBar+43[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 17:03:57
>>marcin+R
Sure, you were right to point out that freshsqueeze was incorrect in saying they funnel donations to their overpaid CEO, but the fungibility point is an important one.

A related point on fungibility turned up in earlier discussions: donating directly to Firefox might not count for much if Mozilla balance it out by redirecting the same sum of their general fund away from Firefox. [0][1]

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24142097

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24131981

replies(1): >>coldpi+9D
◧◩◪
4. coldpi+9D[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 19:45:12
>>MaxBar+43
> overpaid CEO

Overpaid relative to what? Other CEOs of similar sized non-profits? Do you have evidence to support that claim?

replies(1): >>iopq+QWc
◧◩◪◨
5. iopq+QWc[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-23 09:38:28
>>coldpi+9D
Relative to performance.
[go to top]