zlacker

[parent] [thread] 13 comments
1. TypeCa+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-08-18 15:16:38
This is great news for Rust! Maybe I missed it in the post, but what is the name of the foundation? Rust Foundation?
replies(4): >>pietro+g >>elygre+44 >>mamcx+li >>lwb+XJ
2. pietro+g[view] [source] 2020-08-18 15:18:01
>>TypeCa+(OP)
This is still a open question! We made no decision on the name yet.
replies(5): >>mucino+d7 >>Jarwai+He >>rswail+2f >>richar+Ng >>rectan+Aq
3. elygre+44[view] [source] 2020-08-18 15:34:38
>>TypeCa+(OP)
I always thought of Iron as the foundation for Rust. But then again, I'm told I like dad-jokes.
replies(2): >>smolde+79 >>fnord1+Cv
◧◩
4. mucino+d7[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 15:49:24
>>pietro+g
"Iron" seems like a fun/nice option.
◧◩
5. smolde+79[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 15:57:17
>>elygre+44
This would unfortunately be confusing since iron is already a rust web framework.
◧◩
6. Jarwai+He[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 16:19:46
>>pietro+g
Could call it Oxygen, or Oxidize, or something along those lines
replies(1): >>Argora+2j
◧◩
7. rswail+2f[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 16:21:47
>>pietro+g
The Fe foundation, or "FeFo" in short.
◧◩
8. richar+Ng[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 16:29:52
>>pietro+g
Personally I think anything beyond "Rust Foundation" or "Rust Language Foundation" risks merely confusion over purpose.
replies(1): >>noisy_+hi
◧◩◪
9. noisy_+hi[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 16:36:18
>>richar+Ng
I agree. Something like Rust Language Foundation has both the clarity and gravity that it deserves. We will always have crates and components for fun names.
10. mamcx+li[view] [source] 2020-08-18 16:36:41
>>TypeCa+(OP)
"All your references belong to us"...

Can be the motto..

◧◩◪
11. Argora+2j[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 16:39:51
>>Jarwai+He
Oxidize is taken by a Rust conference :). oxidizeconf.com
◧◩
12. rectan+Aq[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 17:13:49
>>pietro+g
The "Ferrous Foundation" is appealingly alliterative. But it also makes it easier to expand the focus beyond Rust — which is probably a negative, because it makes it harder to concentrate on core competency.

Every foundation is engaged in a perpetual struggle over whether to expand its mission. But in the vast majority of cases, mission creep weakens the organization's ability to achieve its primary goals.

(Crafting a concise mission statement will help inoculate against mission creep, and should be done regardless.)

◧◩
13. fnord1+Cv[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-18 17:37:56
>>elygre+44
But the language is named after tree mould, not oxidized metal. :Shrug:
14. lwb+XJ[view] [source] 2020-08-18 18:43:12
>>TypeCa+(OP)
The Krusty Krab?
[go to top]