zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. shawnz+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-08-17 12:07:25
Incredible. People in those threads are accusing the "author" of being GPT-3, and other commenters are chastising them for being so disrespectful as to suggest such a thing.
replies(1): >>dang+YN
2. dang+YN[view] [source] 2020-08-17 17:34:33
>>shawnz+(OP)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24165171
replies(1): >>shawnz+6Q
◧◩
3. shawnz+6Q[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-17 17:43:06
>>dang+YN
To be clear, I'm not saying that person was wrong to criticize the other post necessarily. I just think it's a testament to the abilities of GPT-3 that it could fool a reasonable person.
replies(1): >>dang+901
◧◩◪
4. dang+901[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-08-17 18:34:06
>>shawnz+6Q
That would be true if it had actually happened, but it didn't. What happened is that someone faked it to exploit people's desire for such a thing to happen, and then used the claim to get a lot of attention, including getting some journalists to write about it—whether because they actually believed it, or simply because it was such an attention-getter.
[go to top]