zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. 6ren+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-04-04 01:23:29
If you turned off gravity for comments, then ranking would indicate their relative votes. Users could vote to create what they believe is the appropriate ranking.

I also think quality was higher without gravity for comments. Now, I scan comments to find the highly voted ones. Do you think gravity for comments was a net gain?

BTW: Is it possible to objectively measure the impact of changes, as opposed to be being persuaded by articulately argued complaints?

replies(2): >>crassh+76 >>6ren+vo2
◧
2. crassh+76[view] [source] 2011-04-04 03:25:17
>>6ren+(OP)
> Is it possible to objectively measure the impact of changes, as opposed to be being persuaded by articulately argued complaints?

Yes, if and only if "good" and "bad" comments are defined (intensionally or extensionally).

◧
3. 6ren+vo2[view] [source] 2011-04-06 05:35:11
>>6ren+(OP)
Hybrid: the first comment by hotness (as now), to give up-and-coming comments visibility.
[go to top]