zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. bmelto+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-04-03 22:00:15
Short and snide are by no means mutually exclusive.

I can spend all day writing a post that has no substance, garners upvotes (in today's HN climate) and is as long as the day, but that doesn't make it good, or worthwhile.

Many of my short remarks are actually more to the point, or are asking a relevant question, or are politely correcting errors. It takes considerably fewer words to do this sort of thing than it does to be mean, while trying not to look like it.

replies(1): >>Tycho+n
2. Tycho+n[view] [source] 2011-04-03 22:05:58
>>bmelto+(OP)
Valid points, but I think for any worthwhile comment it's easy to 'extend' the content beyond a single line. For instance, if you're asking a sincere question, you could provide some hypothetical answers, or state your reasons for asking - basically increase the level of mutual comprehension in the entire discourse.
replies(1): >>bmelto+13
◧◩
3. bmelto+13[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-03 22:44:28
>>Tycho+n
Forgive me, I didn't mean to imply that your suggestion doesn't have merit. It does.

I just think that it's far too easy to game.

Another big issue with comment quality, of course, is in the general vagueness of it all. Jokes, for example, are almost always discouraged. Almost. On some occasions, it's quite appropriate.

[go to top]