zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. scythe+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-04-03 20:20:14
Politics, I'm definitely with you. "Current events", though, is an extremely broad term -- what exactly did you intend it to mean?
replies(1): >>tptace+b
2. tptace+b[view] [source] 2011-04-03 20:21:47
>>scythe+(OP)
The guidelines currently say "if they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably off topic". The predicate should be clarified, and the word "probably" removed.
replies(3): >>geuis+X >>Swanni+Z >>Daniel+18
◧◩
3. geuis+X[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-03 20:28:59
>>tptace+b
The problem with this is tv news is uneducated for the most part. People end up posting things to HN that don't fit well, because it doesn't get discussed in other venues. So yeah, you're right though. It's got to be a hard line.
◧◩
4. Swanni+Z[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-03 20:29:10
>>tptace+b
Can we say use common sense? They'd cover Facebook IPO on TV. Yet it would have an impact on a lot of small startups that frequent here.

"Common sense isn't all that common"

◧◩
5. Daniel+18[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-03 22:03:57
>>tptace+b
Wouldn't that ban a lot of tech companies' current actions? Ie, isn't everything happening now in Silicon Valley etc a <i>current event</i>?
[go to top]