zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. nrbafn+(OP)[view] [source] 2011-04-03 06:39:02
I tried Unity in 10.10 too. But, it seems much more polished and usable now.

One real plus in 11.04, is the installer. Really convenient.

replies(1): >>finger+Y1
2. finger+Y1[view] [source] 2011-04-03 07:59:29
>>nrbafn+(OP)
Unity in 11.04 is a different beast than the thing in 10.10 netbook. Unity11.04 is rewritten as a Compiz plugin for performance reasons. Unity10.10 was based on Mutter/Clutter and suffered poor performance b/c of that (among other reasons).

Anyone who used Unity in 10.10 should give 11.04 a new and fair shot since they are 100% different things.

replies(1): >>steevd+x6
◧◩
3. steevd+x6[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-03 11:05:15
>>finger+Y1
The only issue with that is if you don't have a spiffy OpenGL video card. Mutter and Clutter have come a very long way since the decision not to use them.
replies(1): >>frodow+8d7
◧◩◪
4. frodow+8d7[view] [source] [discussion] 2011-04-10 16:11:44
>>steevd+x6
ahh thats where unity 2d comes in :) a brilliant move to include those who gnome shell said "too bad" too. expect to see more of qt in future ubuntu ui improvements
[go to top]