zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. dsr_+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-07-23 17:08:59
For years and years, many motherboards did have graphics sets integrated in. These days, you'll still see that on a lot of server-class motherboards.

e.g. https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/motherboard/M11SDV-4C... -- the line about AST2500 BMC graphics? That runs a VGA port.

replies(1): >>btown+W3
2. btown+W3[view] [source] 2020-07-23 17:27:11
>>dsr_+(OP)
I'm guessing the rationale for this is that even if the server's CPU can support onboard graphics, you wouldn't want to change the CPU's load profile just by plugging in a monitor to debug something? Or even to support CPUs that have no onboard graphics support?
replies(1): >>dsr_+q7
◧◩
3. dsr_+q7[view] [source] [discussion] 2020-07-23 17:45:27
>>btown+W3
Mostly the second -- the high end Intel and AMD CPUs don't have integrated graphics, and nobody wants to spend precious PCIe slots on a graphics card that won't be used except at install time and emergencies... or is more useful as a GPU slot that never produces video output.
[go to top]