zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. boverm+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-07-07 16:46:55
Your first point sounds accurate to me.

I think what we're seeing is the solidification of identity in such strong and unyielding terms that anything that threatens that identity immediately triggers a basic survival instinct. At that point, rational discourse is not possible.

replies(1): >>shadow+Rt2
2. shadow+Rt2[view] [source] 2020-07-08 15:03:56
>>boverm+(OP)
Correct. Rational discourse has already happened, for decades. We appear on the cusp of a structural shift, and in that span of time rational discourse isn't welcome.

People talked about whether the US should enter World War I for years before the German navy targeted US merchant vessels. After the decision to enter, speaking out against the militarization was grounds for arrest. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/fiery-socialist-chall...

[go to top]