zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. rusty_+(OP)[view] [source] 2020-06-24 14:58:47
any defence lawyer with more than 3 brain cells would have an absolute field day deconstructing a case brought solely on the basis of a facial recognition. What happened to the idea that police need to gather a variety of evidence confirming their suspicions before an arrest is issued. Even a state prosecutor wouldn't authorize a warrant based on such flimsy methods.
replies(2): >>ARando+Z2 >>failus+fW1
2. ARando+Z2[view] [source] 2020-06-24 15:11:12
>>rusty_+(OP)
True but the defendant is still financially, and in many cases professionally, ruined.
3. failus+fW1[view] [source] 2020-06-25 01:50:01
>>rusty_+(OP)
Getting a layer that would advise beyond pleading guilty for a reduced sentence is not a default option.
[go to top]